Grok 4.7 (high) vs GPT-6 Sol (max)

Head-to-head on the Towards AI writing benchmark: same 10 real YouTube scripts, five runs each, scored blind by a three-family judge panel. GPT-6 Sol (max) leads overall, 88.0 to 87.8. Their per-model Elo intervals overlap on this board.

Grok 4.7 (high)

#26 Elo 2186 · 87.8/100

GPT-6 Sol (max)

#31 Elo 2166 · 88.0/100

Cost / script

$0.311 vs $0.112

Human baseline

90.9 Grok 4.7 (high) falls below it · GPT-6 Sol (max) falls below it

The verdict

This one is closer than the ranks suggest. Grok 4.7 (high) sits at #26 with 2186.4 Elo and 87.79 overall; GPT-6 Sol (max) is at #31 with 2165.6 Elo and 87.95 overall. Their 95% Elo intervals overlap (2130.8 to 2232.5 against 2127.0 to 2200.7), so do not read much into the exact order. Where Grok 4.7 (high) pulls ahead: Tone & Voice Match (89.77 vs 85.84) and Continuity & Emotion (88.01 vs 86.39). GPT-6 Sol (max) still wins on Length Adherence (91.22 vs 74.12) and Slop Score (EQ-Bench + ours) (94.08 vs 93.30), so it is not a clean sweep. The trade is price: GPT-6 Sol (max) costs about $0.112 per article against $0.311 for Grok 4.7 (high), so you pay for the higher rank. Both are closed. Default to Grok 4.7 (high). Reach for GPT-6 Sol (max) when length adherence, slop score, and the lower price matter more to you than the headline rank.

Pick Grok 4.7 (high) for the stronger board result, tone, and continuity.
Pick GPT-6 Sol (max) for length adherence, slop score, and the lower price.

Reading the Elo intervals. Each range estimates uncertainty around one model's Elo. We repeatedly sample from every model's recorded run scores on each task and recalculate the full ranking. Comparing these separate ranges does not test the Elo gap between two models. The tasks stay fixed, so the ranges do not measure how the ranking would change on new tasks.

Metric by metric

Blue bars: Grok 4.7 (high). Orange bars: GPT-6 Sol (max). Same 0–100 scale; the bold bar wins that metric.

Tone & Voice Match19% weight

89.8

85.8

Writing Craft & Clarity13% weight

87.9

87.8

Substance, Accuracy & Value15% weight

88.6

88.9

Continuity & Emotion14% weight

88.0

86.4

YouTube Best Practices12% weight

89.4

87.9

Hook Strength10% weight

88.1

86.9

Length Adherence8% weight

74.1

91.2

Slop Score (EQ-Bench + ours)5% weight

93.3

94.1

Visual Cue Quality4% weight

88.8

89.2

Everything else that differs

	Grok 4.7 (high)	GPT-6 Sol (max)
Overall / 100	87.8	88.0
Writing Elo	2186	2166
Run-to-run spread (± overall std)	2.670	1.330
Cost per script (USD)	0.311	0.112
Avg latency (s)	519.0	171.0
Open weights	No	No

Full scorecards: Grok 4.7 (high) · GPT-6 Sol (max). How scoring works: methodology.

← All comparisons